Dershowitz: THIS Is the FIRST Question I’d Ask Hunter Biden
Watch this Video To Find Your Pefect Online Job Now!
Introduction:
Renowned legal expert Alan Dershowitz recently shared his insights on the ongoing defamation case involving Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden. In a video created by BlazeTV, Dershowitz discussed the potential significance of Hunter Biden’s testimony and shared his thoughts on what the first question should be. Let’s dive into Dershowitz’s analysis and explore the key points raised in this thought-provoking video.
The First Question – Setting the Tone:
In the video, Dershowitz emphasized the importance of a well-crafted first question when examining a witness. He suggested that the initial query should be aimed at establishing whether Joe Biden was present alongside Hunter during a specific incident involving a tweet to a Chinese businessman. By asking this question, Dershowitz aims to shed light on the nature of Hunter Biden’s interactions and potential influence on his father’s political activities.
Hunter Biden’s Testimony – A Turning Point or Not:
Dershowitz, known for his meticulous legal analysis, expressed skepticism regarding the possible impact of Hunter Biden’s testimony on the defamation case. While acknowledging the significance of sworn testimony, Dershowitz highlighted that it might not be the “smoking gun” that some anticipate. He believes that establishing a substantial connection between Hunter Biden’s words and the alleged damages in the defamation case may prove challenging.
Taking the Fifth Amendment:
If Dershowitz were Hunter Biden’s attorney, he would advise him to consider invoking the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination and can be invoked if testifying might expose them to potential legal repercussions. Dershowitz views this as a possible strategy for Hunter Biden to protect his interests and avoid any unintended legal consequences.
Judicial Watch – Seeking the Truth:
Dershowitz stressed the need for a neutral organization, such as Judicial Watch, to investigate and seek the truth in this case. Balancing the scales of justice requires a thorough examination of the evidence and an unbiased approach to illuminate the facts. With an organization like Judicial Watch involved, there would be an added layer of transparency and accountability in the pursuit of truth.
Doubts in the Delaware Legal System:
Expressing his reservations about the standard of justice in the Delaware legal system, Dershowitz called attention to the potential challenges faced in this particular case. He highlighted the importance of ensuring a fair and impartial legal process, urging the judge to scrutinize the evidence and weigh all relevant factors before making any judgments. Dershowitz’s concerns underline the significance of justice being served without bias or undue influence.
Televise Trials and Hearings:
Dershowitz advocated for all trials and hearings, including those involving high-profile individuals like Hunter Biden or former President Donald Trump, to be televised. He believes that transparency in the legal system strengthens democracy and allows the public to witness the proceedings firsthand. By bringing trials into the public eye, Dershowitz argues that improper influences can be exposed and the commitment to justice can be reinforced.
In conclusion, Alan Dershowitz’s analysis in the BlazeTV video provides valuable insights into the ongoing defamation case involving Hunter Biden. By proposing the first question he would ask Hunter, Dershowitz highlights the significance of establishing connections and revealing crucial information. Furthermore, his emphasis on the need for transparency and fairness in the legal system underscores the importance of upholding justice. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Hunter Biden’s testimony and other factors will impact the case against the Biden family.
