Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing a video created by BlazeTV, which sheds light on a government proposal that could potentially have devastating consequences for rural America. The video features Glenn, a prominent figure in the political sphere, expressing his concerns about the proposed SEC rule for a “natural asset company.” This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the issues raised in the video and the potential impact it could have on rural communities across the country.

The Horrifying SEC Proposal

Glenn begins the video by expressing his disbelief and horror at the new SEC proposal for a “natural asset company.” This proposal would enable the company to purchase land and leverage natural processes to offset carbon emissions. While this may seem like a noble endeavor on the surface, Glenn argues that it could have far-reaching and catastrophic consequences for rural America.

Economic Destruction of Rural America

Utah Treasurer Marlo Oaks, mentioned in the video, strongly opposes the SEC proposal. Oaks believes that implementing this proposal would result in the permanent cessation of economically essential activities such as grazing, mineral extraction, and modern agriculture. The destruction of these activities would have severe repercussions for rural communities that heavily rely on these industries for their livelihoods.

Monetizing Natural Processes

One of the central aspects of the SEC rule is the listing of companies that provide ecological services, rather than focusing solely on profitability. The goal is to monetize natural processes such as clean air and water. While this may seem like a positive step towards environmental conservation, investing in these companies could inadvertently lead to the control of valuable resources like minerals and even air rights.

Impact on Global Food Production and Prices

Glenn highlights an alarming push to ban industrial agriculture, which, if successful, would have a significant impact on global food production and prices. Industrial agriculture plays a crucial role in meeting the growing demand for food worldwide, and any disruption in the industry could have severe consequences for food security.

Restriction of Grazing and Land Use

The proposed natural asset company could potentially restrict grazing on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land and designated areas. This could severely limit the options available to landowners and hinder infrastructure development. Additionally, land in conservation easements could be placed under the control of a natural asset company without the consent of the landowner, further exacerbating the issue.

East vs. West and Limited Access to National Parks

It is crucial to note that the potential impact of this proposal is not limited to a specific region. Both the East and West regions of the country could bear the brunt of its consequences. Glenn warns that the implementation of the SEC rule could lead to increased food prices and limited access to national parks, affecting both local economies and tourism.

In conclusion, the potential implementation of the SEC proposal for a “natural asset company” presents a significant threat to rural America. The proposal’s consequences, if not carefully considered and addressed, could result in the economic destruction of rural communities, increased food prices, and limited access to national parks. It is imperative that citizens and policymakers fully comprehend the potential ramifications of this government scam to protect the interests of the American people and preserve the vitality of rural America.