Trump Indicted For Watching TV | No, Really. That How Stupid The Georgia Anti-Trump Case Is

Are you ready to delve into a ludicrous legal spectacle? Hold onto your seat, because in this blog post, we will explore the mind-boggling case against none other than Donald J. Trump himself. That’s right, you heard it correctly. Brace yourself for the absurdity of Trump being indicted merely for indulging in some television time. Intrigued? Let’s dig deeper into the jaw-dropping details that make the Georgia Anti-Trump case appear astonishingly foolish. So, put on your skeptic hat and join us on this unbelievable journey. You won’t believe your eyes.

Title: Trump Indicted For Watching TV | No, Really. That’s How Stupid The Georgia Anti-Trump Case Is


In a surprising turn of events, former President Donald Trump has been indicted for the fourth time. This time, however, the charges are unlike anything we’ve seen before. In a bizarre twist, Trump is being accused of simply watching television, asking for phone numbers, and attending meetings. As preposterous as it may sound, these trivial activities have landed him in hot water. This article will delve into the absurdity of the indictment brought forth by Fannie Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, and explore the double standard at play.

  1. The Absurd Accusations:

The 98-page indictment against Trump includes a staggering 41 charges. It’s important to note that the majority of these charges revolve around Trump’s activity on Twitter. Yes, you read that right, he is facing legal consequences for tweeting. The indictment goes so far as to make innocuous activities like asking for phone numbers and reserving a room illegal. One can’t help but question the sanity behind such accusations.

  1. Fulton County’s Mishap:

To make matters worse, Fulton County, in an act of sheer incompetence, leaked the names of the grand jurors. This blunder further highlights the lack of professionalism surrounding this whole case. If they can’t even handle the basics of their own legal proceedings, one wonders how they expect to effectively prosecute the former president.

  1. Fannie Willis and Her Quest:

It seems that Fannie Willis has been on a mission to indict Trump for the past two years. Despite numerous failed attempts, she persists. This raises concerns about her impartiality and the potential political motivations behind the indictment. Is this really about justice, or is it merely a personal vendetta?

  1. The Double Standard:

A glaring aspect of this case is the lack of response from Republican D.A.s and District Attorneys. The deafening silence from their end further highlights the double standard in the legal system. If the tables were turned, and a similar indictment was brought against a Democratic figure, would the response be the same? It’s hard not to see this as yet another instance of a legal double standard.


The absurdity of the indictment against Trump is undeniable. Accusing him of watching television, asking for phone numbers, and attending meetings is beyond comprehension. It is evident that this case is rooted in a personal vendetta rather than a pursuit of justice. The mishaps and double standards surrounding this case only further highlight its lack of credibility. Regardless of one’s political stance, it is essential to critically analyze the legitimacy of such indictments and question the motives behind them.


  • [Source 1]
  • [Source 2]
  • [Source 3]

You May Also Like